On Jul 26, 2006, at 6:17 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote:
HttpComponents and MINA have different goals and scope, target different user groups and thereforeshould not be coupled directly.
A very reasonable position which I understand completely.
Overall I find the architecture of MINA quite impressive and I would like to see if some of the MINA code can be borrowed and re-used in HttpNIO.
I'm sure it can be, and I'd be happy to offer my assistance in culling down the MINA code for your purposes.
Would there be any interest in a contribution of a simple HTTP server based on MINA and HttpCore to the MINA project?
Yes, certainly!
Alternatively, I could add such an implementation as an example to HttpCore. At the very leastI would like to make sure that putting HttpCore/HttpNIO on top of MINA is next to trivial, involve little coding and does not require forking of either library. How does that sound?
Ideal! That's getting towards the crux of what I would like to see... There are things in HTTP that are agnostic of the underlying IO mechanism that can certainly be shared, even if MINA-based things are merely the consumer of this project's artifacts.
-pete -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://fotap.org/~osi
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
