On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 10:34 +0200, Ortwin Glück wrote: > Oleg, > > Of course I agree. But I remember that we had seen this before. And I > thought that there was code to check for duplicate status lines. But I > can't seem to remember any details. Does anyone know more? > > Odi >
We have seen something similar a couple of years ago. This kind of problem is not that uncommon, especially in HTTP responses generated by CGI scripts. As far as I remember the argument was all about "common browsers tolerate such protocol violations", which I personally do not find very convincing Oleg > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > Todd, > > > > The request head is completely messed up. Note second instance of the > > status line (HTTP/1.1 200 OK) between Date and Content-Type headers. > > HttpClient is absolutely correct in rejecting this request as malformed > > > > Oleg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
