On Sat, 2006-09-16 at 13:29 +0200, Roland Weber wrote:
> Hi Oleg,
> 
> > All right. We pretty much agree to disagree for now.
> 
> So it would seem :-)
> 
> > Could we at the
> > very least remove these three methods from the HttpClientConnection
> > interface?
> > 
> >     void setTargetHost(HttpHost targethost);
> >     InetAddress getLocalAddress();
> >     void setLocalAddress(InetAddress localAddress);
> 
> I'm fine with that. They were on my death list, too.
> (I have to take the time for a Kill Bill double feature
> one of these days :-) 

Cool. Consider them dead.

> Are you going to replace the open()
> method with one that takes a target (and optional proxy)
> argument then? Opening without a way to specify the target
> would be pretty pointless.
> 

I suggest we deal with it in the course of resolving HTTPCORE-8 

> I can't promise, but I'll try to come up with a new version
> of the HTTPCORE-8 patch soon. One that includes my ideas
> on how NIO could be made to fit in. And it has to be soon,
> as the season of little time for OSS programming is about
> to start.
> 

Let me throw a couple of ideas at you (by posting a patch later this
evening). See if you can incorporate them into your work.

Cheers

Oleg

> cheers,
>   Roland
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to