Kamesh,

What has changed? Frankly, a lot. A lot if *really* important things.

 (1) Architecture
  * New preference architecture
  * Improved exception handling framework
  * Granular non-standards configuration and tracking
  * Improved HTTP Version configuration and tracking
  * Support for streaming entities
  * Support for tunneled HTTP proxies via the ProxyClient
  * Ability to abort execution of HTTP methods

(2) Connection management
  * Support for closing idle connections
  * Support for JDK1.4 connect timeout through reflection
  * Support for connection manager shutdown
            
(3) Authentication
  * Improved authentication framework
  * Plug-in mechanism for authentication modules
  * Interactive authentication support
  * Alternate authentication support

(4) Cookie management
  * Cookie specification plug-in mechanism
  * 'Ignore cookies' cookie policy
  * Improved Netscape cookie support

(5) Redirects
  * Cross-site redirect support

For more details see:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=HttpClient&target_milestone=2.1+Final&target_milestone=3.0+Alpha+1&target_milestone=3.0+Alpha+2&target_milestone=3.0+Beta+1&target_milestone=3.0+Beta+2&long_desc_type=substring&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&resolution=FIXED&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailassigned_to2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailcc2=1&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0=

Moreover, HttpClient 3.0 is about to go RC1 within a week or so.
Basically I see no reasons to not upgrade

Cheers,

Oleg


On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:48:46PM +0530, N V Kameshwara Rao wrote:
> Thanks Oleg,
>    The pointers have been, indeed, very helpful.
>    While i understand the recommendations to upgrade to 3.0,
> am very curious to know if there are any issues in 2.0 that were fixed in
> 3.0.
> 
> Thank you once again.
> rgds,
> kamesh
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 7:14 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: N V Kameshwara Rao
> Subject: Re: Connection Closed by JVM : error when using HttpClient 2.0
> 
> 
> Kamesh
> 
> Please take a look at the HttpClient tutorial and the HttpClient
> exception handling guide:
> 
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/tutorial.html
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/httpclient/3.0/exception-handling.html
> 
> Please note these tutorials are based on new HttpClient 3.0 code. The
> same concepts and principles do apply to HttpClient 2.0 but I would
> strongly recommend upgrading.
> 
> Hope this helps
> 
> Oleg
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:55:26AM +0530, N V Kameshwara Rao wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >    I am a newbie at HttpClient.
> >     I have been trying to implement HttpClient for a Java Web Start
> > Application.
> >    All goes well but I sometimes keep getting this exception which states
> >       Connection closed by the JVM...
> >    How do I resolve this issue? What does the MethodRetryHandler have to
> do
> > with this?
> >    This usually happens when I wait for about a minute or so before
> > executing the PostMethod
> >
> >
> >    Please let me know how I can fix this.
> >
> >    Thanks in advance,
> >    Rgds,
> > Kamesh
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to