On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 11:14 +0100, Ingo Meyer wrote:
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Roland Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Gesendet: Montag, 14. November 2005 10:56
> > An: HttpClient User Discussion
> > Betreff: Re: proxy multithreaded problem
> > 
> > Hi Ingo,
> > 
> > there are two limits to the MTCM: number of connections and 
> > number of connections per host. The latter is set to a rather 
> > low value, I think 2. Make sure to increase both.
> > 
> > hope that helps,
> >   Roland
> > 
> 
> Sorry, this is what I mean with increasing the connection.
> E.g. when I want to dl from two hosts using lets say 200 proxies
> and 50 threads i give the MTCM 100 as number of connections (2x50) and 
> 50 number of connections per host. The proxies are shared by
> a pool so that a proxy is only used once cause I think there are
> proxies who limits the connections for a certain ip.
> 

Ingo,

The MTCM pools connection based on host / port / local address / proxy /
proxy port combination. So, the max connections per host setting does
not indiscriminately apply to all proxy connections. 

Can you try to compare the throughput of a single direction connection
versus that of a single proxied connection to the same host in order to
eliminate the possibility of the proxy being the bottleneck rather than
the connection pool?

Oleg

> This doesn't work!
> When i dl without proxies it works fine. Thats why i suppose the 
> MTCM tries to keep the connection open for every proxy not for the
> real destination, so when i change the proxy, it keeps the connection
> open and cause i using 200 there are many unused opened connections.
> 
> What i've done now is to overwrite the mtcm releaseConnection() so
> he will close always. There was a thread here some days ago about this
> topic...
> 
> But how to do this? My first try:
> 
> package org.ac.net.http;
> 
> <the class>...
> import org.apache.commons.httpclient.HttpConnection;
> import org.apache.commons.httpclient.MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager;
> 
> public class AlwaysClosingMultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager
>       extends MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager
> {
>       public void releaseConnection (
>               HttpConnection conn)
>       {
>               conn.close ();
>               super.releaseConnection (conn);
>       }
> 
> }
> <end>
> 
> Is this ok or do I need some more code?
> 
> 
> Thanks for help
> 
> Ingo Meyer
> 
> 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > "Ingo Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 14.11.2005 09:52
> > Please respond to
> > "HttpClient User Discussion"
> > 
> > 
> > To
> > <[email protected]>
> > cc
> > 
> > Subject
> > proxy multithreaded problem
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm new here and this is my first question...
> > 
> > I want to use httpclient for downloading a big amount of 
> > pages all about 
> > 80k
> > from several servers of our company around the world.
> > This works great with httpclient.
> > But now I'm adviced to use proxies and this works very bad. I 
> > need about 
> > 300
> > connections simultaniously and the speed decrease very much 
> > until it stops
> > nearly.
> > The difference between with and without proxies is 50-100x, 
> > >100k without 
> > p.
> > and <5k with proxies.
> > 
> > I have a static instance of multithreadedconnectionmanager 
> > and httpclient.
> > My guess is that the connections are handled by mtcm for 
> > every proxy not 
> > for
> > the real destination. In my case this is very bad cause I 
> > often change the
> > proxy and this may be the reason why my speed is to slow.
> > When i increase the connections to get more speed overall it 
> > doesn't work.
> > It seems that the
> > socket are limited by java (i tested on xp AND linux)?! As more 
> > connections
> > i give to mtcm in his configuration as more bad the speed is!?
> > Please tell me If you need some code fragment, but i have the standart
> > implementation.
> > 
> > 
> > Any suggestions will be appreciated...
> > 
> > 
> > Greats
> > Ingo Meyer
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to