Oleg, Is there a roadmap available? Or can you indicate when you expect 3.1 to be released?
Regards, Harm. -----Original Message----- From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2005 12:31 To: httpclient-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: ftp via http On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:24:59PM +0100, Laat, Harm de wrote: > Oleg, > > I filed the bug. > Can you give me any indication on when this will be fixed? > > Regards, > > Harm! > In my opinion this problem does not warrant a 3.0.1 release. My preference is to get this one fixed for the 3.1 release Oleg > -----Original Message----- > From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 December 2005 12:12 > To: httpclient-user@jakarta.apache.org > Subject: Re: ftp via http > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:39:30AM +0100, Laat, Harm de wrote: > > However, > > > > There is a comment in URI::setURI(): > > > > L:2266 --> if (_userinfo != null) { // by default, remove userinfo part > > > > Oleg, I tried to see which changes I would have to do in order to change > the > > behaviour so that the credentials are passed. Can you provide me with some > > pointers, as it seems to go throughout the whole sourcecode. I'm not sure > if > > I can break something else. > > > > Regards, > > > > Harm. > > > > Harm, > The URI and related classes is the sole area of code in HttpClient I > prefer to not touch even with a barge pole. This code has been > effectively unmaintained for over 2 years and I personally strongly > favour replacing it with standard java 1.4 URI class(es). It would be > much easier for me to fix it rather than to tell you want needs fixing > > The best thing you could do now is to open a ticket for this issue in > Bugzilla > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oleg Kalnichevski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 21 December 2005 11:36 > > To: httpclient-user@jakarta.apache.org > > Subject: Re: ftp via http > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:26:00AM +0100, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 11:23:58AM +0100, Roland Weber wrote: > > > > Hi Oleg, > > > > > > > > > I always thought the URI class was meant to represent an abstract > URI. > > > > > > > > I'm not arguing against keeping uid/pwd in the URI objects. > > > > > > > > > Besides, in my opinion if the uid/pwd are given in a URI, they > should > > be > > > > > preserved by HttpMethod classes even if they are not applicable for > a > > > > > particular scheme/protocol > > > > > > > > I don't think that uid/pwd should be included in the request > needlessly. > > > > I thought they were intentionally removed at some point in time for > the > > > > sake of improved security, but I might as well be wrong here. It is > hard > > > > to remember the different occasions on which I had discussion about > URLs > > > > containing passwords. > > > > > > > > > > I'll check the commit history > > > > > > Oleg > > > > I am unable to find anything in the commit history suggesting that this > > functionality was removed for security reasons > > > > Oleg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers, > > > > Roland > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
