Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > As far as I understand this statement refers to the Basic scheme. > You're correct, apologies for the misquote on my part. What I really wanted to draw attention to is the limitations inherent to the Digest scheme as outlined in the Security Considerations section, and how sending different nonces doesn't make it 'that' much more secure. Your point is taken though. > There is a feature request for that, which we will look at in the course > of 4.0 development: > > I'll be looking forward to it!
Best Regards, Kevin Crosbie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
