On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 12:02 +0100, Kenny MacLeod wrote:
> Hi Folks,
> 
> I'm trying to find the least verbose way of configuring a 
> DefaultHttpClient with a ThreadSafeClientConnManager.
> 
> The example code given for this goes through a manual process of 
> configuring HttpParams and SchemeRegistry objects, which is more or less 
> copied from the DefaultHttpClient.createHttpParams() and 
> createClientConnectionManager() methods.
> 
> It's a bit of a chicken and egg situation - DefaultHttpClient can create 
> its own HttpParams and SchemeRegistry, which are themselves fine, but 
> only once its been constructed, and the constructor requires the 
> ThreadSafeClientConnManager, but that in turn requires the HttpParams 
> and SchemeRegistry objects.  The only way out is to manually construct 
> the HttpParams and SchemeRegistry, which is a waste.
> 
> It seems to me that DefaultHttpClient's constructor should take a 
> ClientConnectionManagerFactory instead of a ClientConnectionManager. 
> That way, the createClientConnectionManager() method already has the 
> factory reference, and doesn't have to grub around in the HttpParams 
> object to find it.
> 
> The code would then become:
> 
> new DefaultHttpClient(new ThreadSafeClientConnManagerFactory(), null);
> 
> where ThreadSafeClientConnManagerFactory.newInstance() just constructs 
> ThreadSafeClientConnManager.  There's no manual construction of 
> HttpParams and SchemeRegistry, you just leave it up to DefaultHttpClient.
> 
> Have I missed the point?
> 
> kenny
> 

Makes sense. Feel free to open a change request in JIRA. However, we
will not be able to make this change until 4.1 I am afraid. 

Oleg

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to