The benchmark results report a "Concurrency Level" of 25. On 14 March 2010 13:29, Todor Boev <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13.03.2010 18:59, Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: >> Ken Krugler wrote: >>> Hi Todor, >>> >> >> ... >> >>> >>> I was hoping it might be related to nio vs. threaded approaches to >>> HTTP handling. >>> >>> There's been a lot of debate about the value (performance, simplicity, >>> resource consumption) but I haven't seen much head-to-head comparison >>> where the rest of the implementation is roughly comparable. If you >>> ever get any comparison numbers, I'd love to see them. >>> >>> -- Ken >>> >> >> I have made a number of tests comparing HttpCore blocking vs HttpCore >> NIO vs Jetty blocking vs Jetty NIO. The results and the link to the >> source code can be found here: >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/HttpComponents/HttpCoreBenchmark > > So NIO seems to be about 2 times slower than blocking I/O. What was the number > of concurrent connections used? Seems the benefit of NIO is not it's speed but > simply the ability to maintain 10,000 concurrent connections at a time. > > -- Todor > >> >> Oleg >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
