On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 20:26 +0800, Stephen wrote: > Olegk, thanks for you quick reply. > > > Maybe my question is not clear, and I can't say that httpclient's performance > is slow. > HttpClient is very good, I think there maybe some configurations I didn't set > properly, So I want to ask for some help. > > > In my log: > name:E:\Softwares\com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.3.6.update.site_2.3.0.zip.136 > length:1,048,576 type1 time:1,400 > name:E:\Softwares\com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.3.6.update.site_2.3.0.zip.137 > length:1,048,576 type1 time:2,207 > name:E:\Softwares\com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.3.6.update.site_2.3.0.zip.139 > length:1,048,576 type1 time:2,501 > name:E:\Softwares\com.google.gdt.eclipse.suite.3.6.update.site_2.3.0.zip.138 > length:1,048,576 type1 time:2,633 > > > The four threads started together, but why the first thread finished first? > Almost all of the test was the same result, the first completed thread is > much quickly than the other threads. > There is NO way to say for sure because we simply have NO control over the remote site you are uploading files unto. We can only be guessing. As I already said my guess was Microsft Azure was throttling (slowing down) concurrent connections from the same IP address in order to prevent one client from clogging up too much bandwidth.
> > Is there any performance guide for HttpClient 4.1? > HttpClient 4.x default settings are reasonable enough. There is really not much material to put into a guide like that. Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
