> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russell Brown [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:04 AM
> To: HttpClient User Discussion
> Subject: Re: Using ThreadSafeClientConnManager
> 
> On 4 Aug 2011, at 01:18, Mohit Anchlia wrote:
> 
> > I am trying to understand these 2:
> >
> > ClientConnectionManager cm = new ThreadSafeClientConnManager();
> > cm.setMaxTotal(100);
> > HttpClient httpClient = new DefaultHttpClient(cm);
> >
> > Have couple of questions:
> >
> > 1) Can one httpClient object be shared accross multiple threads doing
> > post/get/delete/put requests?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > 2) What happens in above case if there are more concurrent threads
> say
> > 200 than actual no. of connections? So what happens if 200 threads
> > trying to use httpClient object (shared). But we created only 100
> > connections. Does it wait on .execute if all connections are busy?
> 
> The thread attempting to acquire a connection blocks. If you have set a
> timeout then it blocks until the timeout is reached and an exception is
> thrown.
> 
> Worth noting, in your above snippet the max connections per route will
> only be *2*.

Sorry to the OP to hijack this question, but I'd like to understand a little 
more about this.  Is a "route" defined as the path to a particular host?  If 
all of my connections go to the same host, and I'll have numerous threads 
trying to make that connection, do I need to change some default to allow more 
than 2 connections per "route"?

> > Can somone please help me understand?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to