Jaikit, Thanks. I'll take a look at things on Friday when I return to work and will decide from there.
Mike On Aug 8, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Jaikit Savla <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > I am fine with both options which you mentioned. What is the timeline you are > planning to integrate ? If you do not have bandwidth than I can assist you or > start from your code base. Let me know. > > Thanks, > Jaikit > > > ________________________________ > From: Gary Gregory <[email protected]> > To: HttpClient User Discussion <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, August 8, 2012 5:44 AM > Subject: Re: Instrumenting HttpClient library > > Sounds like a nice contribution and efficient for you to do since you've > already done this before. > > Gary > > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:41 AM, mboyers <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Jakit, >> >> I'm the author of the original post you referenced below. I used the >> decorator pattern to create an InstrumentedHttpClient and I'm keeping JMX >> status for everything I mentioned below. >> >> My solution also uses some Spring dependencies so it would need to change >> a bit in order to integrate into the project, but all of the MBeans and >> tracking code is there. >> >> I could either hand this code to you as a starting point or could look >> into integrating it into the project myself. I've wanted to contribute for >> a while since I've used HttpClient for so many years. >> >> Thanks, >> Mike >> >> On Aug 8, 2012, at 4:29 AM, Jaikit Savla <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Oleg, >>> >>> I have created a feature request with little detail about how I am >> planning to implement. Please comment if something needs to be corrected. >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCLIENT-1222 >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jaikit >>> >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> From: Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 7, 2012 5:02 AM >>> Subject: Re: Instrumenting HttpClient library >>> >>> On Mon, 2012-08-06 at 21:39 -0700, Jaikit Savla wrote: >>>> For some reason my previous email had junk characters hence resending - >> sorry for spam. >>>> >>>> Hi Team, >>>> >>>> Is monitoring via JMX already implemented in HttpClient ? >>>> -Number of request (socket) timeouts >>>> -Number of connection timeouts >>>> -Number of timeouts while waiting for connection from pool >>>> -Total number of requests >>>> -Average Request duration >>>> -Maximum Request duration >>>> -Number of connections currently in pool >>>> -Max connections in pool >>>> >>>> If not than can someone please point me to some similar extensions ? I >> can submit a patch for JMX monitoring. >>>> >>>> related request: >>>> http://old.nabble.com/Instrumenting-HttpClient-4-td29464148.html >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Jaikit >>> >>> Jaikit >>> >>> There is no JMX support in HttpClient at this point. If you are willing >>> to put some work toward providing JMX support in HttpClient through an >>> optional module, we would happily take it as a contribution. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> Oleg >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0 > Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
