On 5 Jan 2013, at 3:10 PM, Ken Krugler <[email protected]> wrote:
> So on a large box (e.g. 24 more powerful cores) I could see using upward
> of 10K threads being the
> optimal number.
We are working to make 20-30K connections work on 64 cores.
> Just FYI about two years ago we were using big servers with lots of
> threads during a large-scale web
> crawl, and we did run into interesting bottlenecks in HttpClient 4.0.1 (?)
> with lots of simultaneous
> threads. I haven't had to revisit those issues with a recent release, so
> maybe those have been resolved.
Can you elaborate on that? I guess it would be priceless knowledge :).
Ciao,
seba
--
View this message in context:
http://httpcomponents.10934.n7.nabble.com/AbstractNIOConnPool-memory-leak-tp18554p18646.html
Sent from the HttpClient-User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
