On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 16:52 +0200, Christopher BROWN wrote:
> I agree in principle, as a 7+ 4.4 release does not imply withdrawal or
> self-destruction of previous versions.
> 
> I am curious to know exactly what Java 7 features would be used in HTTP
> client.
> 

It would be mainly try-with-resources [1] and _potentially_ NIO2 [2] for
file based caching in HttpAsyncClient.

Oleg

[1]
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/language/try-with-resources.html
[2] http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/io/file.html

> --
> Christopher
> Le 21 sept. 2013 16:24, "Gary Gregory" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> 
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2013-09-21 at 09:04 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > > On Sep 21, 2013, at 7:23, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 21:28 +0100, sebb wrote:
> > > > >> On 16 September 2013 13:02, Oleg Kalnichevski <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >>> Folks,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Java 1.5 compatibility has become increasing difficult to maintain
> > > and
> > > > >>> increasing pointless on top of that. We, as a project, have been
> > > > >>> thinking about upgrading minimal JRE level requirement for the
> > > > >>> HttpClient 4.4 branch to something newer. While Java 1.6 might be a
> > > > >>> reasonable and a conservative choice in terms of stability and
> > > adoption,
> > > > >>> it actually brings little in terms of new features we could make
> > use
> > > of
> > > > >>> in HttpClient. Besides, Java 1.6 is officially end of life. So, we
> > > might
> > > > >>> as well consider upgrading to Java 1.7 which would give us NIO2,
> > full
> > > > >>> support for 'try with resources', and probably some other features.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Please let us know what you think and respond to this poll.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> All users of HttpClient are encouraged to participate. Every vote
> > > will
> > > > >>> count.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >
> > > > > This is actually a pretty good point. I completely forgot Android was
> > > > > still at 1.6 level.
> > > >
> > > > So what? We are at Google's mercy? Who knows when A will support Java
> > > > 7 or 8 if ever.
> > > >
> > > > Gary
> > > > >
> > >
> > > This is not about pleasing Google. I would not take a squat next to
> > > those people given how badly they crewed us over with HttpClient 4.0.
> > > However, we still ought to take interests of Android developers into
> > > consideration. If we do not immediately start making use of Java 1.7
> > > features, we gain nothing by making lives of Android developers even
> > > more difficult.
> > >
> >
> > Here is how I see it:
> >
> > Our software does not self-update itself and break a Android apps. If a
> > developers, wants features or bug fixes in a new version, he or she
> > evaluates that version and decides if it is appropriate for their use case.
> >
> > If the HttpComponents community decides that the best path for the project
> > is Java 6, then later 7, that's great, it's a measured step to J6, with J7
> > coming next. But sooner or later, Java 7 and 8 are going to come into play.
> > If the HttpComponents community decides that Java 7 is the way to go
> > forward now, then that's great too.
> >
> > If some developers want to stay on Android/Java 6 and they do not want to
> > contribute time and effort into a Java 6 based HttpComponents (in that
> > branch), then they should consider joining us, otherwise, it's dragging us
> > down.
> >
> > The overwhelming response to this thread has been to go to Java 7 straight
> > away. Granted it's just a [POLL] and not a [VOTE], it still reflect the
> > interest of the community.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> > > Oleg
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<
> > http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> > Home: http://garygregory.com/
> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to