Hello , Oleg kindly proposed to help JMeter project in adding HTTP/2 support.
We have started this thread to work on design. As per Andrei remark, it seems ALPN is not yet supported by current HTTPClient 5.x version. Is there some visibility on its support ? Thanks for your help. Regards On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <a...@ya.ru> wrote: > Hi, > > From my experiments, I see that lack of two specific features make it > not useful. According to https://hc.apache.org/news.html: > > * No ALPN support yet > * no connection upgrade > > Especially ALPN part is crucial for protocol functioning. Is there any > ETA from Oleg when it will become available? > > > In general, we can start designing the "synchronous way" solution. From > my understanding, it is doable and will be good enough for the beginning. > > > Andrey Pokhilko > > On 25.01.2017 23:38, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > > Hello > > I'd like to start a thread on this particular item for which an > enhancement > > exists: > > > > - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59847 > > > > The aim of this thread is to discuss, throw ideas on how we could > implement > > this in JMeter. > > > > Oleg K. from HttpComponents project has nicely proposed to help on it. > > > > I see at least 2 parts in this item: > > > > - The Sampler > > - The Recorder > > > > > > > > *Sampler:* > > We have 2 options: > > > > - build a usual "synchronous" sampler similar to HTTP: > > - Is this realistic ? > > - Does it perform well ? > > - + : It should not be too complex > > - build a new "Asynchronous sampler": > > - Is this realistic ? > > - + We could gain more performance > > - - It is a huge piece of work as we need to change JMeter model > > > > *Recorder:* > > > > I think we need to introduce a new more generic Recorder as the current > > Test Script Recorder is too tightly linked to HTTP 1.X protocol > > > > > > Regards > > Philippe M. > > @philmdot > > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
