On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 20:58 +0100, Roland Weber wrote: > Oleg Kalnichevski wrote: > > > True. But I somehow I can't help thinking #open() and #update() might > > suffice. Why not use #open() / #update() instead of #prepare / #open()? > > Ah, I get the idea. Modal behavior of open(). > I didn't think of that because it means calling > open() with a socket that is not open :-) > >
This is the reason why I personally prefer 'bind'/'rebind' semantics to 'open/'update'. Oleg > > I'll try to put together a patch for your consideration. > > Thanks, I'll have a look at it next week-end. > > cheers, > Roland > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
