On 19/05/07, Ortwin Glück <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
sebb wrote: > http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > > shows the proposed rules, which don't seem to be particularly > restrictive for LGPL. Excuse me, Sebastian, this page lists the LGPL under Category X. X for "must not apply to any software within an Apache product". And you find that "not particularly restrictive"? I'm a bit puzzled now, to say the least. Anyway, I didn't mean to kick off yet another discussion about including JCIFS in Apache or not. I think all committers agree that we avoid the hell of problems by doing such an integration outside of Apache.
Quote: "Therefore, LGPL v2.1-licensed works must not be included in Apache products, although they may be listed as system requirements or distributed elsewhere as optional works." Seems to me that it should not be too difficult to make JCIFS an optional work. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
