On Mon, 2007-05-21 at 17:49 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Oleg, > > > Given the uncertainty surrounding the future of Jakarta I would like > > jakarta prefix dropped from all HttpComponents artifact ids (and from > > pom.xml altogether). This can potentially ease the transition of the > > project to another TLP (be it Web Services or a new TLP). > > Artifact IDs are global, right?
I believe only GroupID + ArtifactID combination is expected to be unique. > So if we drop jakarta from them, we > don't have a distinguishing element from potential httpcomponents in > other programming languages anymore. Can we insert a -java or -j? > > httpcomponents-j-core > httpcomponents-j-nio > httpcomponents-j-niossl > > That should last for some decades, until somebody invents a new > programming language called J. I read about D today, and I dimly > remember having read about E some years ago... > I am not aware of Maven POMs being used by (or being useful for) any non-JVM based languages. And I am not really worried about someone wanting to start an HttpCore implementation in Ruby within ASF. I am more worried about unwieldy and cryptic package names. I think we can safely assume 'org.apache.httpcomponents.httpcore*' namespace is unique enough. > > > The 'situation' with Jakarta is getting truly grotesque > > I didn't notice any change lately ;-) > Good point ;-) Oleg > cheers, > Roland > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
