Hi Sebastian, > But in theory, one still has to use something like Integer.MAX_VALUE > to absolutely guarantee that the entry will be added at the end...
True. Now I remember why I wanted -1 to map to the end of the list. > If you don't want to use a magic number, why not have an addAtEnd() method? Because we already have too many methods in the interface to manage two simple lists. *sigh* Add constants AT_END to the interfaces? Or the extra methods? Or leave it as it is? cheers, Roland --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
