quick update...
>>> interface HttpParams
>>> interface ModifiableHttpParams
>>>
>> Do you still envisage the following way of setting HTTP parameters?
>>
>> httpclient.getParams().setParameter("whatever", someObject);
>
> Hm, no, not really. Should we encourage modifying parameters
> that are already passed to the framework in the first place?
Within core, only AbstractHttpMessage creates params internally
and requires a downcast for modification. In client, it's the
DefaultHttpClient, and only as a fallback if no parameters are
passed to the constructor or set explicitly.
cheers,
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
