On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 18:53 +0200, Roland Weber wrote: > Hi Eric, > > >> It seems that our use of "Release Candidate" for something > >> between beta and final is not the intended interpretation. > > > > Actually I believe a lot of ASF projects are using the -rcX suffix > > exactly for that purpose > > oh, good. I don't have enough of an overview to judge that. > > >> a) ignore it and continue to use the label as before > >> b) find a new label between beta and final > >> c) have betas until we're final > >> > >> I'm -0 on a, but have no preference among b and c. > > > > I see no problems with a) and c). b) is pretty confusing if there's no > > page describing the new label ;-) > > ;-) > > > IMO the above page should be changed to clarify that the term "release > > candidate" is ambiguous and is used in several ways, e.g.: > > What would be the forum to discuss changes to the general Apache pages? > That one doesn't fall into the "legal" category. > > > Confusing, eh... ;-) > > > yepp :-) > > cheers, > Roland >
Roland, Eric and all I suggest we work out a coherent release methodology that works best for _us_ and just stick to it. I can put together a first draft of the document. Oleg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
