On 08/12/2007, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-12-08 at 19:24 +0100, Roland Weber wrote: > > Erik Abele wrote: > > > Sorry, I hit some very time-consuming family dilemma and were not able > > > to act so far, my fault :-( > > > > No need to apologize. Family is always more important. > > I had some of that too in the last few weeks. > > > > > I've a hard-stop between 15. and 27. of Dec so I really hope to have the > > > basics done before that and then, as others are available, the rest > > > after it - I guess that fits nicely with your schedule too. > > > > Yes, that fits well. If the other PMCs are still fine with that, > > I can take over the role of PMC chair at the end of next week. > > > > > As said, the most important thing is the name of the sub-domain / unix > > > group / svn / wiki - I'd suggest the following and if that's ok then we > > > can start: > > > > > > subdomain: > > > hc.apache.org (plus alias httpcomponents.a.o which redirects to hc) > > > > > > unix group: > > > hc > > > > > > svn: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpcomponents/... > > > > +1 to all of those. > > > > +1
+1 > > > > wiki: > > > http://wiki.apache.org/general/httpcomponents/ > > > (plus redirect from old http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-httpclient/) > > > > Where does the /general/ come from? The other projects don't > > seem to have a similar prefix, if you have a look at the links: > > http://wiki.apache.org/general/ > > So I suggest > > http://wiki.apache.org/httpcomponents/ > > > > > OR, if we want to use the confluence wiki: > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/HTTPCOMPONENTS > > > > Hrmpf, yet another Wiki with different markup ;-) > > I'm fine with the Wiki we have and it should make the > > move easier. But I know that other projects are using > > the confluence wiki to generate their websites. If > > somebody here would prefer to do that, I won't object. > > > > I do not have a strong preference either. +1 Wiki -0 Confluence at this point; +0 once TLP is up and running - no point causing extra work just now... > > > > Mailing-Lists: > > > see recent discussions > > > > To summarize the latest suggestions: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] new > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > I don't see a need for a separate issues@ list, > > all issues can be sent to dev@ either directly > > or by filing an issue in JIRA. > > > > +1 +0 I'd suggest a separate issue list. Makes it a lot easier to use the dev mail archives such as nabble etc. But if it causes other problems, don't worry. > > > (from your other mail...) > > > > > my concern is more that you're disappointed, not the board :) > > > > Don't worry. I didn't expect much activity in the short term. > > After all, we rushed the TLP proposal a bit. I don't remember > > seeing a vote about it on [EMAIL PROTECTED] - nor here ;-) > > But as long as we have lazy consensus, that should be fine. > > > > And thanks again for taking care of things... and us :-) > > > > +1 to that. +1 > Oleg > > > cheers, > > Roland > > > > PS: I'll keep the machine running for a few more hours, > > will check for mails occasionally this evening. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
