On Thu, Sep 11 2014, yan <[email protected]> wrote: > One potential downfall is that this would make the ruleset list very > large, and HTTPS Everywhere is probably less efficient at doing its job > than HSTS.
This is sort of an odd comment, isn't it? Isn't the fundamental model of https-everywhere to have a ruleset for every site on the web? jamie.
pgpMQeZgi8lBw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ HTTPS-Everywhere mailing list [email protected] https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/https-everywhere
