Am 17.09.2014 22:27 schrieb Claudio Moretti:
My 2c: as far as I remember, rules are pushed into stable when one of
the EFF developers (with commit rights on the main repo) has time to
review them.

There probably is a similar discussion in the list's archive, but the
main reasoning behind this was, also as far as I can remember, that
reviewing a rule is not as easy as it looks like. There are certain
websites that mostly work but have a few pages that fail (epically)
and, in the users' best interests, manual verification was required.

Now, there was talk about writing a testing suite for rulesets, to
allow automatic verification, but nobody had the time to do it... If
you can, you're welcome to try :)

Also, I did write (a while back) a small Python script that compares
the Alexa top 1M with our development branch and spits out the rules
not yet merged in stable that match websites in the list. However,
this can only give you priority on which rules to check first...
Imagine if we automatically merged a broken rule for Google...

/scary thoughts

Anyway, if you can support on the testing suite you'd make a lot of
people in this list very, very happy!

Cheers,

Claudio

Thanks for the info.

Just to pick up the example myself:
Has anyone on the development branch had problems with the rule openstreetmap.org? I haven't. So I vote for an upgrade to the stable branch.

Another thing I stumbled upon:
Is the HTTPS Everywhere Atlas still being updated? For leo.org it states that there is only a rule in the development branch.
https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/atlas/domains/leo.org.html
But with the latest Chrome version of https everywhere I get redirected and also see in the URL bar that there is some rule in my version.
_______________________________________________
HTTPS-Everywhere mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/https-everywhere

Reply via email to