Isn't that a wee bit, um, fascisitic of Mozilla? Shouldn't they at least make it user-controllable?
Or perhaps they do. Otherwise, what would add-on developers do? On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > FYI, Mozilla just announced they are planning to require all extensions > be reviewed, approved, and signed by addons.mozilla.org before they can > be installed from a third party website: > > > https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2015/02/10/extension-signing-safer-experience/ > > We have already submitted HTTPS Everywhere to AMO, and are going through > the (slow) review process, so this isn't a huge change for us. Hopefully > the process to get a signature for a third party website is much faster > than the process to upload a new version to AMO. Otherwise we will be > faced with a very slow release process. > _______________________________________________ > HTTPS-Everywhere mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/https-everywhere >
_______________________________________________ HTTPS-Everywhere mailing list [email protected] https://lists.eff.org/mailman/listinfo/https-everywhere
