Christoph - On 12-09-09 03:48 AM, Christoph Spiel wrote: > The copyright issue boils down to the > question whether the new file "impexalpha.hxx" is a > "substantial portion" of the old Vigra code > "impex.hxx" (The quote comes from Vigra's MIT > license.) We are sorting out this one.
Why is "substantial portion" an issue? Do you intend to publish the file under a different license, and if so which one? How are you going about sorting this out? > On another side we still have problems with the > Graph Cut algorithm when linked against new > Vigra. Maybe, Mikołaj can report more. Are these technical problems or licensing problems? Yuv -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Developers, which is subscribed to Hugin. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685877 Title: Push VIGRA changes to the right place Status in Enblend: In Progress Status in Hugin - Panorama Tools GUI: Confirmed Status in “enblend-enfuse” package in Debian: Confirmed Status in “hugin” package in Debian: Confirmed Status in “enblend” package in Fedora: New Bug description: Enblend embeds a modified version of the VIGRA 1.4 library. Can we push the necessary changes to VIGRA's upstream and use the system version rather than an embedded copy? Details: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542258 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/685877/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~hugin-devs Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~hugin-devs More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
