On Sat 08-Nov-2008 at 18:21 -0500, Robert Krawitz wrote: > >My experience has been that using automatic control point generation >for typical outdoor panoramas is all but useless -- it picks a fair >number of seemingly random control points in the sky and clouds that >at best aren't very well aligned and at worst are completely incorrect >(from the wrong images).
The 'celeste' functionality in the current hugin trunk should be very good at removing these 'sky' control points. Another technique that works with bracketed images is to only set control points on the most exposed set, where the sky is blown-out. This is what the match-n-shift --stacks option does when it finds a bracketed series. >I'd rather see an assistant (or at least an option) with an interface >more like Fotoxx -- drag and drop the images into rough alignment. >This might speed up control point generation, since it would have to >search much smaller regions of the images. This is really a manual workaround for problems in current image matching systems, the best solution is for control point generation to become much faster and much more accurate. -- Bruno --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
