2009/6/3 Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> > > On 2009-06-01, Bruno Postle <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > * hugin will use system lapack if available. Note that this is > > experimental, you may find that optimisation is slower than before > > and may even fail. > > On my system (OpenBSD) lapack is detected and used if it's installed, > but we must also link with libm and libblas, otherwise there are > unresolved symbols, causing linking of celeste_standalone to fail. >
Same on MacOSX (also in the earlier builds after 3880). I thought it had something to do with MacOSX being a little different than the linuxes and BSD's around. The cmake version finds lapack, but the build itself doesn't use it. why? (still MacOSX being a little different?) The XCode build just "crashed" due to the unresolved dependencies. As we are trying to release a stable 0.8, I disabled the lapack functionality for OSX as Hugin has functioned correctly very long without it. So, I decided to postpone it on OSX after the 0.8 release (and yes, I know, that was not a democratic decision). That's also why I decided not to ask Lukas about it as he is busy now with his gsoc project. Hoi, Harry --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
