Bruno Postle wrote: > On Thu 11-Jun-2009 at 13:23 -0500, Gerry Patterson wrote: >> Just so I understand, any bugs that are marked '9' prioity and are 'open', >> need to be fixed before the 0.8.0 release? > > In principle yes, in practice they are not so consistent. > > At the moment I can only recommend: 'advanced' search all the open bugs > for hugin, batch-processor and hugin-critical, excluding the ones > that are OS specific, this should return about 80 reports. > > You then need to make a judgement as to what is important.
I've attached a patch to one of the three bugs. <https://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2803939> I don't have write access to libpano's SVN. A 0.8.0 release is overdue. The sooner the better. I suggest being very strict about what bugs or application behaviors to consider show stoppers. If it affects negatively functionality that was working in 0.7.0 it is definitely a show stopper. Most of them can be left for subsequent releases. We "just" have to be consequent and keep fixing them at current speed and release more often. Yuv --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
