Hello Tom et al., On 18 July, 17:13, Tom Sharpless <[email protected]> wrote:
> On further consideration, what about ending our dependence on > "hfov" altogether? Firstly I would suggest to use something like dfov, diagonal fov which would be independent of portrait or landscape photo orientation. But of course other ways work as well. In any case portrait-landscape- independent. Secondly, if one were to touch this part of the remapping maths, I would suggest to incorporate the missing quintic barrel distortion parameter at that time as well, see separate thread. So one would only have to touch these routines once. Cheers Klaus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
