cspiel wrote: > Furthermore, Texinfo is a powerful format, it > comes with fast translators to a variety of > output formats, and the sources are plain ASCII. > FYI, I would fight extremely hard against a > documentation format change. > > To address the "collaboration" question: Anyone > can work on the documentation as they would work > on the code.
Well, not anyone. I for example can't. And since you asked for proof readers which are not necessarily programmers I assume most of them can't either. TeX is not very common among ordinary users. And you hardly would find an non-programmer who will be willing to install a source control system only to commit some better phrases for a manual. On the other hand the wiki pages are pretty popular, simply because they are easy to find. They should be up to date IMHO. However, after some searching I found that texi2html used together with a file "mediawiki.init" would produce mediawiki text. Could someone with texi2html installed try to convert one of the manuals to mediawiki text and see how it displays in the panotools wiki? Or mail me the result off list that I can try? best regards -- Erik Krause http://www.erik-krause.de --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
