Yuval Levy wrote: > Jim Watters wrote: > >> We wont need to define a new annotation to identify control points >> belonging to a particular plane if we assume all control points of an >> image that is using Ti or Tr are of the same plane. >> > this is exactly the assumption I want to get rid of. Photos have depth > and I can't tell the CP generator not to consider extruding, intruding, > or protruding elements of a fassade. > > Yuv > If we want to build entire 3D environments so we can walk through it, then yes, every plane must be identified. And every edge of those planes. None of our automated CP generators can do that. Although we are getting line detection. Maybe they can be combined?
What we might need is a new optimizer that calculated the distance a point is from the plane and a CP clean that removes points that are furthest from the plane. The control points on the anchor images identify the plane. My interest in using the Tr Ti is for placing the a nadir shot that was taken off NPP, for removing a reflection in a mirror by taking an additional shot, or for assembling spherical panoramas that were taken handheld. -- Jim Watters jwatt...@photocreations.ca http://photocreations.ca --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
