Yuval Levy wrote:
Hi all. Thank you for the feedback. *Keep it coming*. I want to hear more
opinions about Hg. In the meantime, a few notes, trying not to advocate the
change, just addressing points raised and acknowledging that more discussion
and experimentation are needed on both sides of the argument.
Hi Yuv
I have more experience with git, but hg is probably just as good,
perhaps easier to use if I understand correctly.
I think it will be great for hugin to use a distributed versioning
system, centralised systems are much less suitable for open source
projects I think. (And if you want centralised, it can be done using
git/Hg as well).
for git you can read a pretty good book online http://progit.org
One thing that git can do much cheaper than subversion is to make
branches. This does affect the workflow of the project and this is
something you need to define before getting too deep into it. In the
progit.org book (you can buy it on dead trees as well), a chapter is
dedicated to the workflow possibilities, this is a good read to get
started (doesn't matter if you choose Hg or git)
Cheers
Simon
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscribegooglegroups.com or
reply to this email with the words "REMOVE ME" as the subject.
