On Apr 7, 10:49 pm, "John McAllister" <[email protected]> wrote: > Why are you trying to exposure optimise a scene series that probably doesn't > need it?
Well, in the preview window it looked like it *did* need it, but the stitched result actually does look fine as you predict. This leaves some questions, though: 1. Does something (enblend?) tweak exposure settings even without exposure optimization? 2. Is that error message an über-cryptic way of saying "this step is unnecessary for this scene" or did you just guess from my description of the input? 3. Even if the photometrics did start out perfect, shouldn't optimization just suggest minuscule adjustments instead of blowing up? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
