I cant comment too much on your worflow because I havent experimented
much. however, I have had some great results by working as follows:

- generating HDR images first for the bracketed sets. ( I've been
using  Photomatix to batch combine all images if there is no movement
or  manually with Dynamic Photo HDR if there is some movement)
-Using these images in hugin, generating control points etc and
outputting only an EXR file
-tonemapping in either photmatix or dynamic photo hdr.

Its worked great for me so long as the images are lined up well
although I have found parallax and alignment errors really show up
with HDR.

With regard to your workflow - How are you generating your 16bit TIFs?
and how come your working that way, ie not importing HDR images into
hugin just out of interest?

Zac


On 21 Apr, 23:09, slaterson <[email protected]> wrote:
> i have been experimenting with creating hdr exr images from hugin.  i
> have tried this a couple ways and so far the images that were output
> are very bad, filled with off colored pixels and noise that doesn't
> appear in the ldr output.  is this a known issue or is there perhaps
> something wrong with my workflow, images, or installation of hugin and/
> or libraries?
>
> my workflow is the following:
> 1) process images as 8bit, usually using only one image from each
> bracketed set (1/3 of the entire image set), as tif
> 2) import 8bit tif files to hugin
> 3) generate control points, clean, optimize and stitch until i am
> happy with the ouput
> 4) generate 16bit tifs for all images (-, 0 and + ev)
> 5) copy my pto file from hugin to a new directory where the 16bit tifs
> were written and open
> 6) import the additional images (usually the - and + ev shots) and use
> align_image_stack or, lately with the svn version of hugin, set the
> stack # correctly for each stack of images
> 7) check the preview window
> 8) stitch as hdr and write output to an exr file.
>
> when i open the exr file it is very bad quality.  the ldr output from
> my initial alignment and setup is much better (regardless of
> tonemapping, etc...).  the noise i am seeing is not present in the
> individual photos.
>
> i am using hugin from svn and enblend 4.0 on gentoo 64 bit.  happy to
> put some samples on flickr or picasa to illustrate what is happening.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
> A list of frequently asked questions is available 
> at:http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to