> > In general we recommend stitching a spherical panorama to the > > 'standard' equirectangular projection first - Stitching directly to > > a very wide stereographic image means that some photos are remapped > > to extreme shapes and scales, this takes longer and the geometry can > > cause problems. > > > Once you have a single equirectangular file it is quick and easy to > > extract a 'little planet' or any other view. > > i have used that workflow several times and in the past 6 months or so > i have been using stereographic as a first run.
to clarify, when i say 'i have used that workflow...' i am referring to the workflow of creating an equirectangular image and re-projecting it as stereographic. i have found that it isn't necessary to do that with my panos, i have had a lot of success going straight to stereographic output from my image set. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
