On May 17, 3:07 pm, "T. Modes" <[email protected]> wrote: > tested official repository now. The first pull took about 2 hours. Is > this normal?
sounds slow to me. I'm running `hg clone` now, will report my time later. > @ Harry > I think, you did the right thing. Have a look on the graphic > representation of the > repohttp://hugin.hg.sourceforge.net/hgweb/hugin/hugin/graph > There you can see that with your merge you merged the 2 "heads" (one > with my changes and the one with your changes). I think, we will see > this more in the next time. yes, I think we will see more of these kind of "minor branching" and there is nothing wrong with them. Doing an `hg pull && hg up` before committing as suggested by Kornel is a good reflex *if* one is hooked to the net. Otherwise, merging at the next possible occasion like Harry did is the right thing to do. We need to learn to live with Hg. Yuv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
