Hi Tom, I am just arriving from London. The reception was very good. I was even asked more than once why Computational Aesthetics and not SIGGRAPH. Apparently we might have been the only paper authors contacted by the NewScientist (regarding the Symposium).
--daniel On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Tom Sharpless <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > At the recent International Symposium on Computational Aesthetics in > Graphics, Visualization, and Imaging in London, sponsored by the > Eurographics Association, Dan German presented a research paper on the > Pannini Projection authored by me, Bruno Postle and himself. (http:// > vedutismo.net/Pannini/). > > Now New Scientist, the British popular science magazine, has done a > short piece on it. Parts of that are true, others not, or misleading; > but we are content to have been noticed. And to have had our names > spelled right. (http://www.newscientist.com/article/ > dn19054-18thcentury-painters-give-photography-new-perspective.html). > > Cheers, Tom > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > > -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
