A thousand panos? again, I question the purpose. Yes, you'll get some data to mine, but what for? Over the years I've used plenty of stitching software for plenty of panos.
Some is perspective corrected, some not. Is lack/presence of perspective correction a feature or a bug? The answer depends on the user. Some is fully manual, some is fully automatic, and some is in between. Is lack/presence of automatism vs. control a feature or a bug? The answer depends on the user. Some is fast some is slow. Is speed a feature or a bug? Break it down to GUI interaction time vs. asynchronous processing time and the answer still depends on the user and how he decides to interact with the software. All software was/is pretty accurate in the sense that it deals consistently with user input and works as advertised. The inaccuracies I have found where mostly located between the chair and the keyboard or around the no parallax point. Or more directly stated: the bug lies between two ears and the fix lies between the same two ears. Yuv On August 26, 2010 04:14:16 am Jeffrey Martin wrote: > FWIW i have tried similar comparisons, and there are some panos which > will stitch perfectly on one program and not another. > > try it with a thousand panos, and maybe you'll have some interesting > conclusions.....until then, it's just anecdotal.... > > cheers, > jeffrey > > On Aug 26, 2:19 am, Yuval Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On August 25, 2010 02:49:27 pm Dale Beams wrote: > > > I did not fix this, rather, closed the program and started something > > > else. > > > > what's the point of this incomplete comparison other than stating that > > some programs work better for you than other programs? > > > > Yuv
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
