Another thought on a work-around for this enblend bug is for hugin to automatically invoke enblend 3 times for any more than one row panorama; once for an upper, once for a lower and a third time to combine the two. This may also help resolve memory leak issues with enblend.
Bill On Sep 10, 7:46 am, awbrody <[email protected]> wrote: > I have had the same problem in the past. There is a thread dealing > with the issue, and it does appear to be a bug in enblend. One > solution that seems to work consistently is to use hugin/nona to > produce the warped images and then to use enblend via command line to > produce two overlapping partial panoramas and then again to blend > those two. You can find the initial invoking of enblend in the window > that echos the stitching process and copy that text into a simple text > editor. Then you modify the text to do the partial stitches. One thing > that happens on my mac is that the automatic invocation of enblend > lists the files to be blended one to a line and in order to use > enblend from the command line the entire command must be a single line > with no hard returns. > For example > /Applications/HUGINstuff/enblend-enfuse-4.0-mac/enblend-openmp -- > compression LZW -v -v -w -f240000x7834+0+1625 -o outfilename.tif > infilename001.tif infile002.tif ..... where all of this is on a single > line and the 240000x7834+0+1625 refers to WIDTHxHEIGHT+BOTTOM_CROP > +TOP_CROP > (it is possible I have the top and bottom crop mixed up, but you will > see the correct way if you examine the invocation of enblend in the > output window as noted above. > > Bill Brody > > On Sep 9, 10:29 am, "John McAllister" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi Panoheads... > > > I have been stitching and enblending sixteen 15Mpix images (8x2), producing > > 195Mpix pictures. > > I am being bothered by some odd artifacts appearing in the output. > > The artifacts consist of one or more dead straight lines, spanning up to a > > half of the width of the pictures and tilted slightly down. > > The lines are quite thick, generally black, but white over a lighter > > background, and appear to be feathered. > > I suspect Enblend. > > They also seem to be arbitrary in that repeat blends of the same set do not > > reproduce the same blemishes. > > > I have included a JPEG, which is scaled about 1:11, to illustrate. > > > Help!!! > > > Artifact.jpg > > 12KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
