Thanks Yuval, I think I've solved it. My system has 8GB of RAM. I tried using a version of Enblend compiled without image cache and I finally got a successful stitch! Thanks for your suggestions.
On Sep 13, 5:33 pm, Yuval Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > On September 13, 2010 04:35:36 pm Brandroid wrote: > > > Two other pieces of information that may be important: The remapped > > images from Nona are all as they should be (proper bit depth, properly > > mapped). I also successfully stitched two of the images in this pano > > at 10k by turning off the other 6. > > how much RAM do you have on your system? > > did you try to run enblend from the command line rather than from Hugin? > > did you try to blend the eight nona-remapped images two by two, and then do > the same with the four resulting blends, and then blending the two results? > > Yuv > > signature.asc > < 1KViewDownload -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
