Hi James, Thanks for the fix, but I still don't understand: How 3x 4288x2488 pixel images end up with 960 giga pixels which is 960 000 000 000 pixels image.
For me making a square from those 3 images: 3x width and 3x height = 12864x7464 = 96 016 896 pixels. Aligning them should not take more space right ? In Your case its 9998 times more... Am I correct ? On Oct 12, 5:40 pm, James Legg <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 00:51 -0700, Mateusz wrote: > > Hi James, > > > I haven't seen change yet, but can the warning (or maybe it already > > does) contain predicted output size and information what to do if this > > is not intentional ? > > The warning is of this form: > Are you sure you want to stitch such a large panorama? > > The panorama you are trying to stitch is 960.4 gigapixels. > If this is too big, reduce the panorama Canvas Size and the > cropped region and stitch from the Stitcher tab. Stitching a > panorama this size could take a long time and a large amount of > memory. > > It appears if trying to stitch with a crop region over half a gigapixel. > > > I guess it's not possible to calculate how much memory algorithm will > > use ? > > It might be, I haven't checked how Nona and Enblend allocate memory. > > -James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
