On October 31, 2010 06:11:13 pm Eric O'Brien wrote: > I will say that I think a slightly more tolerant original response on > Yuval's part could have avoided an escalation. :(
here [0] is my original response. Would you please be so kind and point me to which part of it is not tolerant enough to your taste? Yuv (being way to tolerant of your bad habit of top posting [1]) [0] http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/msg/8a23f6f8a238c5e2 [1] from the netiquette http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html "If you are sending a reply to a message or a posting be sure you summarize the original at the top of the message, or include just enough text of the original to give a context. This will make sure readers understand when they start to read your response."
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
