On 27 Dez., 10:24, Emad ud din Btt <[email protected]> wrote:
> My second question is....Control point generation is most important part of > panorama creation. So Why we cant work or discuss over it? as you can see, we're discussing the matter at great length. > When we talk about PTgui, Autopano or other commercial softwares, we assume > its a full package and CP generation is part of it.I am not into comparisons > here but you will admit CP generation is essential part of Panorama creation > softwares. CPs are - let's call it central - but you might even get away without them in some projects. You can easily create them manually. But often - not always - the input lends itself to automatic CP generation and the CPGs do a good job. It's an area where there is a great wealth of tools available. See, amongst others: http://autopano.kolor.com/ http://aorlinsk2.free.fr/panomatic/ http://user.cs.tu-berlin.de/~nowozin/autopano-sift/ CPGs work, but there are strings attached: - you may have to invest some effort in obtaining, installing and interfacing to them - you may have to learn how to use them - most are actually documented, some of them even quite thoroughly, and especially on Windows you have a very good selection, but they may not work for you 'out of the box' with standard parameters. - you may not be allowed to use them commercially, due to software patent issues - finally, no CPG can work if the input isn't suitable, so sometimes failing to get CPs from a CPG throws a light on flaws in your photography. Kay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
