On Mon 03-Jan-2011 at 03:31 -0800, Daniel M. German wrote:
thinking aloud, the fact that the field of view changes when the image is in landscape mode might have interesting repercussions during optimization.
In practice the polynomial changes the angular distance between adjacent stitching seams whatever the photo orientation. The fact that the angular distance between the sides of a portrait photo doesn't change isn't that interesting since we rarely use the data at the sides.
I wonder if a better solution would be to scale with respect to the corner of the frame.
...and abandon the a,b,c polynomial while we are at it. There are definitely better lens models, the question is do we need the pain involved with changing from the existing model?
-- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
