Hi, There is no update/feedback on this issue. Is there anyone working on it or it is not doable.
I think at the moment please just provide simple solution like 4 rows above so that pictures can be easily identified. On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:16 PM, Emad ud din Btt <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there any update on this issue? > > > > > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Sigma Relief <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am glad this is a common issue and it looks like there are lots of >> ideas. I like the proposed dynamic area that automatically shows all >> selected photos, but it should be an option, not a replacement for the >> context of seeing where in the sequence images lie. >> >> Allowing the user to adjust the height of the tab section and thus >> control how many lines are displayed would solve the how many to show >> dilemma. >> >> While on this topic, a more direct way to find a specific image would >> be useful. Many CAD systems let users right click through a stacked >> layer of parts to select hidden objects. A similar right click option >> to cycle thru stacked photos, identify the number of a selected photo, >> and perhaps most importantly, allow editing of some sort would be >> great. >> >> Being able to directly remove a selected image from the project via >> the preview pane once selected, either thru the tab at top or a new >> right click option is a good first start to weed out bad images. >> >> Allowing masks to be drawn in preview will allow much greater >> continuity and speed for tweeking multi row images. Being able to >> crop all the moving heads from the upper row of a pano shot in a crowd >> quickly would be nice. Same goes for moving clouds between rows. >> There would obviously need to be some method of selecting which image >> or images to apply masks to. >> >> Adding control points would be another obvious feature to add to the >> preview tool once images can be directly selected. A zoom function >> would make placement a lot more accurate. The current scroll wheel >> field of view change(when they are selected) is mostly useless as is >> is not used often and the manual slider is much more accurate when >> needed. I'm sure zooming is a heavy set of computations, but resizing >> the window works like a charm, I don't see why this should be that >> different. >> >> An even more exotic control point feature would be an auto find >> feature that takes a user selected point on 1 image and searches >> nearby areas in all stacked photos for similar points. A dynamic >> threshold that starts lower than normal (after all, these points were >> probably not found in the origional search) and increases based on the >> angular distance (not pixel distance) from the chosen point. I have >> found selecting the exact same point on stacked photos, especially >> architectural ones with hard lines helps mediocre alignment projects, >> but gets time consuming when 5 or more images stack. It is these >> heavily overlapped corners that such a feature helps with most by >> getting everything to converge on 1 point. >> >> Being able to see control points that only tie to a single image could >> help root out bad images as the current implementation gets >> overwhelmed in large projects. A feature to sort by worst average >> control point distance for an entire image would also point out >> trouble images better than the worst pairs list in the control points >> tab. >> >> Well that got a bit out of hand, I hope I don't kill a good thread. I >> know feature requests are a dime a dozen, but the new fast preview is >> so good in my opinion that it deserves a spot in the creation chain, >> not just to check results. >> >> On Jan 13, 8:21 am, kevin <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Jan 13, 3:36 am, kfj <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > I sympathize. In complex multi-sequence situations with large numbers >> > > of images, trying to identify images by looking at 'which number >> > > lights up' (or reverse) is a pain, since often the numbers for the >> > > image one wants to identify are outside the currently displayed range. >> > > This has often annoyed me. But where does one draw a line? 100 images? >> > > 200? two rows? three? maybe there's a better way altogether? >> > >> > > Kay >> > >> > > On 13 Jan., 05:54, Sigma Relief <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > > Just a minor request for the GUI on the fast preview feature in >> > > > windows; make the numbered tabs closer together when there are more >> > > > images. The old version could fit 50+ on a 1600 pixel wide screen >> > > > while fast preview fits 40 with large spacing between tabs. >> Reducing >> > > > spacing would be a good easy start. Wrapping to a 2nd or 3rd line >> > > > would make identifying images easier as it eliminates having to >> > > > continually scroll back and forth when using the identify feature. >> At >> > > > least in Windows, there is plenty of room for 3 rows of numbers, 1 >> > > > above the current row and 1 where the horizontal scroll bar is. A >> > > > small vertical scroll bar could be used for more than 3 rows. >> > >> > > > Are there any simple variables a user could tweak to improve this? >> > >> > > > I'm not sure if there is an official feature request area so any >> > > > pointers would be appreciated. >> > >> > What about in addition to the row with the scroll bar there's a line >> > where the numbers change. If there's no mouse on an image the area is >> > blank, when the mouse moves over images that area is used to show >> > which image numbers are currently highlighted and they can be colored >> > just like the scrolled row is. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. >> A list of frequently asked questions is available at: >> http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<hugin-ptx%[email protected]> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx >> > > > > -- > > > *Emaad* > www.flickr.com/emaad > > -- *Emaad* www.flickr.com/emaad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
