On 9 February 2011 13:51, Yuval Levy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On February 9, 2011 07:00:45 am Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
>> from the descriptions when registering new blueprint it
>> seems to me that it's supposed only to be a list of proposed ideas
>> with short description of each.
>
> Yes.  The entry there is a summary of the use case, relatively immutable. Not
> the place to work on the specs.
>
> The field "specs URL" points to a wiki page where others can collaborate with
> you on the specs.
>
>
>> Should I add the complete proposal to
>> blueprint summary no mater what is in it's description or should I
>> rather create a page in panotools wiki with more detailed description
>> and link to it?
>
> I would suggest you articulate the (immutable) idea in the Summary, leaving
> the details for a linked wiki page where others can add their ideas to yours
> in the detailed specs.
>
> When the specs have achieved a milestone update the Whiteboard of the
> Blueprint (not visible on registration, but visible and editable on the
> blueprint's page itself).  See an example at [0].
>
> If I understand you correctly, you have already an initial specs.  Very good.
> Put it on the Whiteboard, so that it shows that the Blueprint is at a more
> advanced staged than the simple idea.
>
> The wiki is for drafting, the Whiteboard is for approving.  You will approve
> into your Whiteboard specs only those suggestions from the wiki that make
> sense to you.
>
> Here are some links to excellent specs [1].  All in wikis, but if you wrote
> yours as a set of screen mockups in Inkscape or present them as a youtube
> video, feel free to link that instead.
>
> And here is a good text on how to write good specs [2].
>
> HTH
> Yuv
>
> [0] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-maverick-gnome
> [1] https://help.launchpad.net/GreatSpecifications
> [2] https://help.launchpad.net/WritingGoodSpecifications
>

Hi Yuv,
Thank you for giving me insight into how blueprints are used. For now
I've registered blueprint [1] and a wiki page [2] with complete
proposal. The proposal is open for suggestions. I already included
some from the hugin-ptx thread referenced in the wiki page.

If nobody objects I'd like to add a link to the
http://wiki.panotools.org/GSOC_2011

Lukas

[1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/hugin/+spec/straight-line-ui
[2] http://wiki.panotools.org/Straight_Line_UI_proposal

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to