-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jeffrey
This [0] is the preview I get from a new project using hugin 2010.5.0.ad4e44f10418 and your pictures, The final image looks like [1]. You can find the project file at [2]. - From my point of view, there is nothing wrong with the stitching of these images done by hugin. Or did I miss something? Of course, I used the photometric optimization from the Exposure tab, but that is what it is for, isn't it? And WB is something that should be handled by your raw converter (or in-camera if you shoot jpgs). You can not really expect that hugin will handle that. BTW, where did you get that dog from? I somehow never managed to get such a perfect fitting extra in any of my images;) With kind regards Stefan Peter [0] http://www.stepet.ch/docgraves/docgravesPreview.png [1] http://www.stepet.ch/docgraves/P1000097-P1000112.tif [2] http://www.stepet.ch/docgraves/P1000097-P1000112.pto Am 14.02.2011 17:37, schrieb Jeffrey Martin: > here are some of the images: > > www.vrlog.net/temp/dog-grave-1row.zip (69MB) > > if you put them in Hugin, and generate control points, and then > optimize, you should see that the exposure was also changed on all the > images. > - -- In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNWalHAAoJEBgqi52L7+L/GHIIAIlhwmZWpBGhGydH+2LYMM/B X2O+gRgMQZWlYfCtUACwKG4V1RuYvXoRTwHFBUyQwOlULGg8GGL/+lB5YFJuUuJA aD15NUPLP6mMMTFXj/85zHY2b8h3sTqVRGVQPdV/asJq+86i8ZvoVshXPNIYN3EA //sieMfakMZFvnv5xEUtAtwnoz+eDxygPZ6yXRtL1OCy3u0aXeVd17QvxYx9tJHl fFqJ89pGCFB1xqqKF7xf6FLGLN0fEquYz4yKBTlVKkKNSHPK94c0QxyFpGWBXmIM ujo2wevzn1L3gbQAvIaE/jXvL/BJd91yr4oMCnM2WvGFBAvQi4jy5MgS2FkqLDs= =XazG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
