On 22 Nov 2011 08:15, "Rogier Wolff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I thought that for a horizontal controlpoint pair, the lattitude > simply doesn't count. So all that the optimization step cares about > is the that they line up horizontally. > > Similarly for the vertical control lines. There the horizontal position, > or longitude is not taken into account.
This is effectively true with equirectangular, or any of the other cylindrical output projections. > I thought that all this was independent of the projection > being used for the final result. Nope, the horizontal and vertical points are evaluated in the output canvas, so the output projection is critical. This is much simpler conceptually, as far as the optimiser is concerned they are the same thing. -- Bruno -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
