Yes, I agree with you Jeffery. If CPFIND has option to analyze smaller versions than working will be very fast.
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Jeffrey Martin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have asked before... I wish I could do something besides only ask :( > I REALLY wish cpfind had a way to analyze smaller version of images (it > uses 1/2 size but default but it's either this or fullsize - nothing else!) > > when you have 50 (or 500) source images, it would be extremely helpful to > e.g. examine 1/8 size images - if you can get CPs with that, it will be so > much faster than using 1/2 size images, obviously. > > > > > On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 4:37:23 PM UTC+1, RizThon wrote: >> >> If I resize my pics to be 1000x669 then I can correctly stitch 24 >> images (8 towards the horizon, 8 30° up, 8 30° down). >> By the way, is there a way to reuse the pto that I created with the >> smaller resolution images? It looks like when I choose "Apply >> Template" with the big resolution images, I lose all the control >> points. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. > A list of frequently asked questions is available at: > http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx > -- *Emaad* www.flickr.com/emaad -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
